[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D50912: Don't cancel the current IOHandler when we push a handler for an utility function run.
Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 22 15:19:27 PDT 2018
jingham added a comment.
It's not a huge deal, but it would be disconcerting to have a bunch of text dumped to your console the next time you continue. I think the ideal solution would be for utility functions to push a "capture & report" IO handler, so the Utility function could retrieve what went to stdout when it was running, and choose whether to display it or not (for instance, display it only if the function errored out...)
More information about the lldb-commits