[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D50912: Don't cancel the current IOHandler when we push a handler for an utility function run.
Greg Clayton via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 22 15:11:34 PDT 2018
clayborg added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50912#1209994, @jingham wrote:
> What would happen to any output that the process produced while running the utility function if we did this.
I believe it would still be fetched on next stop. Just not real time. Do you think anyone running a utility function would need to ever fetch data real time? "utility" in my mind means not started by a interactive user. Am I wrong?
More information about the lldb-commits