[cfe-dev] DWARFv5 by default in clang?

[Adrian Prantl via cfe-dev]

On Darwin, we still have a sizeable number of test failures to go until we're there: https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-matrix/ <https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-matrix/>

-- adrian

> Am 11/4/21 um 2:58 PM schrieb David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>:
> 
> Should we change Clang's default to DWARFv5?
> 
> (I'm motivated by having fixed a bug because I only tested with v4 - I should've tested with v5, but got me thinking about maybe v5 is just a better default at this point)
> 
> Google's been using v5 as the default for the better part of a year at this point - not the most debugger usage, but we validated GDB and LLDB for v5 pretty well & haven't encountered major issues since the switch.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20211104/915146db/attachment.html>