<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">On Darwin, we still have a sizeable number of test failures to go until we're there: <a href="https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-matrix/" class="">https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-matrix/</a><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">-- adrian</div><div class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Am 11/4/21 um 2:58 PM schrieb David Blaikie <<a href="mailto:dblaikie@gmail.com" class="">dblaikie@gmail.com</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Should we change Clang's default to DWARFv5?<br class=""><br class="">(I'm motivated by having fixed a bug because I only tested with v4 - I should've tested with v5, but got me thinking about maybe v5 is just a better default at this point)<br class=""><br class="">Google's been using v5 as the default for the better part of a year at this point - not the most debugger usage, but we validated GDB and LLDB for v5 pretty well & haven't encountered major issues since the switch.</div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>