[cfe-dev] DWARFv5 by default in clang?

David Blaikie via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 4 14:58:21 PDT 2021


Should we change Clang's default to DWARFv5?

(I'm motivated by having fixed a bug because I only tested with v4 - I
should've tested with v5, but got me thinking about maybe v5 is just a
better default at this point)

Google's been using v5 as the default for the better part of a year at this
point - not the most debugger usage, but we validated GDB and LLDB for v5
pretty well & haven't encountered major issues since the switch.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20211104/33f8322f/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list