[cfe-dev] Is Clang 3.6 still supported as host compiler for libcxx?

[Asiri Rathnayake via cfe-dev]

We (ARM) are also planning to setup several libc++  bots, as we have
started to ship libc++ in quite a few configurations.

I just need to find some time for this. Hopefully more CPU cycles will come
:)

Cheers,

/ Asiri

On 28 Oct 2016 21:55, "Renato Golin via cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
wrote:

> On 28 October 2016 at 21:34, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote:
> > FYI I worked around the regression in r285445 by simply changing the
> > initialization syntax. The testsuite still runs flawlessly with 3.6 after
> > that small fix.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> > I would love to add builders for older Clang versions but I only have so
> > many free CPU cycles.
>
> Simon (CC'd) said he could have some spare CPUs for old builds, maybe
> we should add libc++ to the list of things to test.
>
> My libc++ bot builds so sporadically that the board is mostly idle.
> Should be trivial.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20161028/0bcb4678/attachment.html>