[cfe-dev] Is Clang 3.6 still supported as host compiler for libcxx?

[Eric Fiselier via cfe-dev]

FYI I worked around the regression in r285445 by simply changing the
initialization syntax. The testsuite still runs flawlessly with 3.6 after
that small fix.
I would love to add builders for older Clang versions but I only have so
many free CPU cycles.

/Eric



On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
wrote:

> On 28 October 2016 at 21:06, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote:
> > However libc++'s ultimate consumer is the in-tree
> > clang it's going to be installed beside, and the implementation should
> > optimize for that case.
>
> Right, that's why I think that, in a future where we need to hold an
> old GCC as requirement and libc++ *needs* to evolve, "it should be ok"
> to mark it at a higher GCC version OR Clang OR stage-2.
>
> But as you say, this is a last resort.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20161028/94eb097f/attachment.html>