[cfe-dev] Is Clang 3.6 still supported as host compiler for libcxx?

[Renato Golin via cfe-dev]

On 28 October 2016 at 21:06, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote:
> However libc++'s ultimate consumer is the in-tree
> clang it's going to be installed beside, and the implementation should
> optimize for that case.

Right, that's why I think that, in a future where we need to hold an
old GCC as requirement and libc++ *needs* to evolve, "it should be ok"
to mark it at a higher GCC version OR Clang OR stage-2.

But as you say, this is a last resort.

cheers,
--renato