[cfe-dev] Adding -add-override functionality to cpp11-migrate tool

[Philip Dunstan]

Sure. I will sync to latest and re-create the patches against a more recent
revision.

PS. This was the email from Feb 13.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130211/074110.html

Phil
--
Philip Dunstan
phil at philipdunstan.com
www.philipdunstan.com


On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Vane, Edwin <edwin.vane at intel.com> wrote:

>  I don’t see any emails from you to cfe-commits on Feb 13. Last email I
> see is from Feb 4 when the patches were still under review and you were
> working on some problems. I don’t remember ever seeing a reviewer’s
> approval. Could you send the patches again?****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Philip Dunstan [mailto:phil at philipdunstan.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:51 AM
> *To:* Vane, Edwin
> *Cc:* Dmitri Gribenko; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; Matthieu Monrocq
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cfe-dev] Adding -add-override functionality to
> cpp11-migrate tool****
>
> ** **
>
> Sorry, I haven't had a chance to chase this up lately. I've been changing
> jobs and then on holiday for a couple of weeks with limited internet access.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> I posted the latest set of patches to cfe-commits on February 13 but I
> don't think they were ever committed. Do I need to do something in
> particular to have the patches applied?****
>
> ** **
>
> thanks.****
>
> Phil
> --
> Philip Dunstan
> phil at philipdunstan.com
> www.philipdunstan.com****
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Vane, Edwin <edwin.vane at intel.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Any news on this transform?****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Philip Dunstan [mailto:phil at philipdunstan.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 05, 2013 2:02 PM
> *To:* Dmitri Gribenko
> *Cc:* cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; Matthieu Monrocq; Vane, Edwin
> *Subject:* Re: [cfe-dev] Adding -add-override functionality to
> cpp11-migrate tool****
>
>  ****
>
> I've attached patches that include this new test:****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>
> ****
>
> Phil
> --
> Philip Dunstan
> phil at philipdunstan.com
> www.philipdunstan.com****
>
>  ****
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Philip Dunstan <phil at philipdunstan.com>
> wrote:****
>
> > I haven't modified yet how the insertion point for the override keyword
> is
> > calculated. Dmitri suggested FunctionTypeLoc::getRParenLoc() but I don't
> > think that this will work if there is a trailing const keyword or
> deferred
> > return type.****
>
> Could you please add a test with a trailing return type anyway?
>
> class A {
> public:
>   virtual int h();
> };
>
> class B {
> public:
>   auto h() -> int;****
>
> };
>
> Dmitri
>
> --
> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20130327/1bb030c3/attachment.html>