[cfe-dev] [analyzer] Reorganization of Checker files

[Chris Lattner]

*shrug* ok

-Chris

On Dec 22, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Ted Kremenek wrote:

> I think this is a good first step.  We can rename the namespace later.
> 
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:01 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote:
>> 
>>> "GR" = graph reachability
>> 
>> Is that really the best prefix to use?  Why not dump everything in a sa (static analyzer) namespace?
>> 
>> -Chris
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We'd like to reorganize the Checker related code of the static analyzer to make it easier for browsing and to give it its own namespace.
>>>>> (The important "heads up" here is that there will be a lot of breakage for those maintaining separate patches).
>>>>> 
>>>>> An idea is the 'GR' prefix, that is used in many classes, will be dropped and the 'GR' namespace will be introduced containing all checkers-related code.
>>>>> The directory hierarchy will be like this:
>>>> 
>>>> No objection.  Silly question: what does GR stand for?
>>>> 
>>>> -Chris
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>> 
>>