[cfe-dev] [analyzer] Reorganization of Checker files

[Ted Kremenek]

I think this is a good first step.  We can rename the namespace later.

On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:01 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:

> 
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote:
> 
>> "GR" = graph reachability
> 
> Is that really the best prefix to use?  Why not dump everything in a sa (static analyzer) namespace?
> 
> -Chris
> 
>> 
>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> We'd like to reorganize the Checker related code of the static analyzer to make it easier for browsing and to give it its own namespace.
>>>> (The important "heads up" here is that there will be a lot of breakage for those maintaining separate patches).
>>>> 
>>>> An idea is the 'GR' prefix, that is used in many classes, will be dropped and the 'GR' namespace will be introduced containing all checkers-related code.
>>>> The directory hierarchy will be like this:
>>> 
>>> No objection.  Silly question: what does GR stand for?
>>> 
>>> -Chris
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>> 
>