[cfe-dev] [analyzer] Reorganization of Checker files

[Tom Care]

Sounds great Argiris :) I also agree we can generalise the name to something other than GR, but for now this is a good step.

On 22/12/2010, at 5:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:

> *shrug* ok
> 
> -Chris
> 
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Ted Kremenek wrote:
> 
>> I think this is a good first step.  We can rename the namespace later.
>> 
>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:01 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote:
>>> 
>>>> "GR" = graph reachability
>>> 
>>> Is that really the best prefix to use?  Why not dump everything in a sa (static analyzer) namespace?
>>> 
>>> -Chris
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We'd like to reorganize the Checker related code of the static analyzer to make it easier for browsing and to give it its own namespace.
>>>>>> (The important "heads up" here is that there will be a lot of breakage for those maintaining separate patches).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> An idea is the 'GR' prefix, that is used in many classes, will be dropped and the 'GR' namespace will be introduced containing all checkers-related code.
>>>>>> The directory hierarchy will be like this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> No objection.  Silly question: what does GR stand for?
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Chris
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>>>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev