[cfe-dev] [analyzer] Reorganization of Checker files

[Chris Lattner]

On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote:

> "GR" = graph reachability

Is that really the best prefix to use?  Why not dump everything in a sa (static analyzer) namespace?

-Chris

> 
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> We'd like to reorganize the Checker related code of the static analyzer to make it easier for browsing and to give it its own namespace.
>>> (The important "heads up" here is that there will be a lot of breakage for those maintaining separate patches).
>>> 
>>> An idea is the 'GR' prefix, that is used in many classes, will be dropped and the 'GR' namespace will be introduced containing all checkers-related code.
>>> The directory hierarchy will be like this:
>> 
>> No objection.  Silly question: what does GR stand for?
>> 
>> -Chris
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>