[cfe-dev] DragonFly ToolChain Patch

[Daniel Dunbar]

Hi Alex,
Thanks for the patch, I will review & get this in ASAP (but possibly not
till Monday).

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Alex Hornung <ahornung at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the attached patch enables a DragonFly target in the clang driver,
> allowing us at DragonFly to use llvm/clang properly without relying
> heavily on gcc.
>
> While so far the patch has been working, if anybody spots a mistake
> please say so! It will probably not be the last revision of it but
> nonetheless I would prefer if it could be commited upstream as it avoids
> having to keep a dragonfly-local patch which has to be handed to anyone
> using llvm/clang on df.
>
> I've also added an option to Options.def (-nolibc). We rely on it at
> DragonFly although it is not standard. I'm not sure what the policy on
> this is, but I would think that it doesn't hurt comitting that upstream,
> too.
>

What do you mean by non-standard? I assume it is part of gcc on DragonFly,
or does DragonFly maintain a patch to add support for this?

 - Daniel


>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20090501/8938a5a0/attachment.html>