[cfe-dev] Which revision of clang for LLVM2.5?

[Daniel Dunbar]

Do you have a particular reason for using LLVM 2.5? Since you are already
checking out the source, why not just use LLVM top of tree with clang top of
tree. This should always work, and if not its a bug and we are generally
quite quick to fix it.

If you really want to do this all someone needs to do is find the revision
where we tagged LLVM 2.5, checking out that clang revision should work fine
with that LLVM.

 - Daniel

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Graham Wakefield <lists at grahamwakefield.net
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Which revision of clang is safe to build against LLVM 2.5?  Just tried
> on the current svn and got a whole range of build errors for clang.
>
> If there is none, then which is safe against 2.4?
>
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20090313/fff19741/attachment.html>