[cfe-dev] Which revision of clang for LLVM2.5?

[Eric Christopher]

On Mar 13, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Graham Wakefield wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Which revision of clang is safe to build against LLVM 2.5?  Just tried
> on the current svn and got a whole range of build errors for clang.
>
> If there is none, then which is safe against 2.4?

Clang follows ToT LLVM fairly closely, you might be best trying to  
find the version that matches some version around then :(

Or, probably for the best, just use both versions out of current svn.

-eric