[clang] Revert "[clang-format] Annotate ::operator and Foo::operator correctly" (PR #164670)

[via cfe-commits]

owenca wrote:

> As per @efriedma-quic's comment I'll go ahead and revert the commit again to prevent the immediate breakage.

@PiJoules, I don't know if @efriedma-quic's comment was an endorsement of your original hasty (and incomplete) revert, but it didn't address the first part of the policy I quoted above. Please stop forcing your incomplete revert in without first consulting the clang-format team @mydeveloperday, @HazardyKnusperkeks, etc. If we reach the consensus to fix #160513 by reverting instead of by fixing forward, you need to identify the proper "set of patches" to revert and open a pull request for approval by the clang-format team. That set must include both #111115 and #164048 and most likely one or more commits in between. cc @JohnC32

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164670