[clang] [libclang/python] Derive library function types from annotations (PR #142120)

[Jannick Kremer via cfe-commits]

DeinAlptraum wrote:

Yup that summarizes it pretty well.
So I don't see this having more than a very limited use, and for that it's not worth the various overheads and intransparencies it introduces. Shall I close this?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142120