[clang] Clang: Support minimumnum and maximumnum intrinsics (PR #96281)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -58,7 +58,9 @@
 
 // Check __has_constexpr_builtin
 #if  !__has_constexpr_builtin(__builtin_fmax) || \
-     !__has_constexpr_builtin(__builtin_fmin)
+     !__has_constexpr_builtin(__builtin_fmin) || \
+     !__has_constexpr_builtin(__builtin_fmaximum_num) || \
+     !__has_constexpr_builtin(__builtin_fmaximum_num)
----------------
graphite-app[bot] wrote:

There appears to be a duplicate check for `__builtin_fmaximum_num`. The second occurrence should likely be `__builtin_fminimum_num` instead to cover both new intrinsics. Please review and update this condition to ensure all intended builtin functions are properly tested.

*Spotted by [Graphite Reviewer](https://app.graphite.dev/graphite-reviewer/?org=llvm&ref=ai-review-comment)*<i class='graphite__hidden'><br /><br />Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.</i>

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281