[clang] Implement resource binding type prefix mismatch flag setting logic (PR #97103)
Damyan Pepper via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 8 15:43:43 PDT 2024
================
@@ -437,7 +460,406 @@ void SemaHLSL::handleShaderAttr(Decl *D, const ParsedAttr &AL) {
D->addAttr(NewAttr);
}
+struct register_binding_flags {
+ bool resource = false;
+ bool udt = false;
+ bool other = false;
+ bool basic = false;
+
+ bool srv = false;
+ bool uav = false;
+ bool cbv = false;
+ bool sampler = false;
+
+ bool contains_numeric = false;
+ bool default_globals = false;
+};
+
+bool isDeclaredWithinCOrTBuffer(const Decl *decl) {
+ if (!decl)
+ return false;
+
+ // Traverse up the parent contexts
+ const DeclContext *context = decl->getDeclContext();
+ while (context) {
+ if (isa<HLSLBufferDecl>(context)) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ context = context->getParent();
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+const CXXRecordDecl *getRecordDeclFromVarDecl(VarDecl *SamplerUAVOrSRV) {
+ const Type *Ty = SamplerUAVOrSRV->getType()->getPointeeOrArrayElementType();
+ if (!Ty)
+ llvm_unreachable("Resource class must have an element type.");
+
+ if (const BuiltinType *BTy = dyn_cast<BuiltinType>(Ty)) {
+ return nullptr;
+ }
+
+ const CXXRecordDecl *TheRecordDecl = Ty->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+ if (!TheRecordDecl)
+ llvm_unreachable("Resource class should have a resource type declaration.");
+
+ if (auto TDecl = dyn_cast<ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl>(TheRecordDecl))
+ TheRecordDecl = TDecl->getSpecializedTemplate()->getTemplatedDecl();
+ TheRecordDecl = TheRecordDecl->getCanonicalDecl();
+ return TheRecordDecl;
+}
+
+const HLSLResourceAttr *
+getHLSLResourceAttrFromEitherDecl(VarDecl *SamplerUAVOrSRV,
+ HLSLBufferDecl *CBufferOrTBuffer) {
+
+ if (SamplerUAVOrSRV) {
+ const CXXRecordDecl *TheRecordDecl =
+ getRecordDeclFromVarDecl(SamplerUAVOrSRV);
+ if (!TheRecordDecl)
+ return nullptr;
+ const auto *Attr = TheRecordDecl->getAttr<HLSLResourceAttr>();
+ return Attr;
+ } else if (CBufferOrTBuffer) {
+ const auto *Attr = CBufferOrTBuffer->getAttr<HLSLResourceAttr>();
+ return Attr;
+ }
+ llvm_unreachable("one of the two conditions should be true.");
+ return nullptr;
+}
+
+void traverseType(QualType T, register_binding_flags &r) {
+ if (T->isIntegralOrEnumerationType() || T->isFloatingType()) {
+ r.contains_numeric = true;
+ return;
+ } else if (const RecordType *RT = T->getAs<RecordType>()) {
+ RecordDecl *SubRD = RT->getDecl();
+ if (auto TDecl = dyn_cast<ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl>(SubRD)) {
+ auto TheRecordDecl = TDecl->getSpecializedTemplate()->getTemplatedDecl();
+ TheRecordDecl = TheRecordDecl->getCanonicalDecl();
+ const auto *Attr = TheRecordDecl->getAttr<HLSLResourceAttr>();
+ llvm::hlsl::ResourceClass DeclResourceClass = Attr->getResourceClass();
+ switch (DeclResourceClass) {
+ case llvm::hlsl::ResourceClass::SRV: {
+ r.srv = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ case llvm::hlsl::ResourceClass::UAV: {
+ r.uav = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ case llvm::hlsl::ResourceClass::CBuffer: {
+ r.cbv = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ case llvm::hlsl::ResourceClass::Sampler: {
+ r.sampler = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ else if (SubRD->isCompleteDefinition()) {
+ for (auto Field : SubRD->fields()) {
+ QualType T = Field->getType();
+ traverseType(T, r);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void setResourceClassFlagsFromRecordDecl(register_binding_flags &r,
+ const RecordDecl *RD) {
+ if (!RD)
+ return;
+
+ if (RD->isCompleteDefinition()) {
+ for (auto Field : RD->fields()) {
+ QualType T = Field->getType();
+ traverseType(T, r);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+register_binding_flags HLSLFillRegisterBindingFlags(Sema &S, Decl *D) {
+ register_binding_flags r;
+ if (!isDeclaredWithinCOrTBuffer(D)) {
+ // make sure the type is a basic / numeric type
+ if (VarDecl *v = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(D)) {
+ QualType t = v->getType();
+ // a numeric variable will inevitably end up in $Globals buffer
+ if (t->isIntegralType(S.getASTContext()) || t->isFloatingType())
+ r.default_globals = true;
+ }
+ }
+ // Cbuffers and Tbuffers are HLSLBufferDecl types
+ HLSLBufferDecl *CBufferOrTBuffer = dyn_cast<HLSLBufferDecl>(D);
+ // Samplers, UAVs, and SRVs are VarDecl types
+ VarDecl *SamplerUAVOrSRV = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(D);
+
+ if (CBufferOrTBuffer) {
+ r.resource = true;
+ if (CBufferOrTBuffer->isCBuffer())
+ r.cbv = true;
+ else
+ r.srv = true;
+ } else if (SamplerUAVOrSRV) {
+ const HLSLResourceAttr *res_attr =
+ getHLSLResourceAttrFromEitherDecl(SamplerUAVOrSRV, CBufferOrTBuffer);
+ if (res_attr) {
+ llvm::hlsl::ResourceClass DeclResourceClass =
+ res_attr->getResourceClass();
+ r.resource = true;
+ switch (DeclResourceClass) {
+ case llvm::hlsl::ResourceClass::SRV: {
+ r.srv = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ case llvm::hlsl::ResourceClass::UAV: {
+ r.uav = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ case llvm::hlsl::ResourceClass::CBuffer: {
+ r.cbv = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ case llvm::hlsl::ResourceClass::Sampler: {
+ r.sampler = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (SamplerUAVOrSRV->getType()->isBuiltinType())
+ r.basic = true;
+ else if (SamplerUAVOrSRV->getType()->isAggregateType()) {
+ r.udt = true;
+ QualType VarType = SamplerUAVOrSRV->getType();
+ if (const RecordType *RT = VarType->getAs<RecordType>()) {
+ const RecordDecl *RD = RT->getDecl();
+ // recurse through members, set appropriate resource class flags.
+ setResourceClassFlagsFromRecordDecl(r, RD);
+ }
+ } else
+ r.other = true;
+ }
+ } else {
+ llvm_unreachable("unknown decl type");
+ }
+ return r;
+}
+
+static void ValidateMultipleRegisterAnnotations(Sema &S, Decl *D,
+ StringRef &Slot) {
+ // make sure that there are no register annotations applied to the decl
+ // with the same register type but different numbers
----------------
damyanp wrote:
I was having a closer look at this because `unordered_map`s always ring alarm bells for me and `unordered_map`s of `sets`s ring those bells double time.
I think that this function is jumping through a lot of hoops to make e1 below be accepted while e2 is rejected:
```
Eg e1 : register(u9) : register(u9); // accepted
Eg e2 : register(u9) : register(u10); // error
```
Is that right? I don't see any test cases equivalent to the e1 case.
I'd question if there's much purpose in putting a lot of energy into supporting this, as opposed to just rejecting anything where there is more than one annotation for the same register type.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97103
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list