[clang] Fix/interp init list unnamed bitfields (PR #87799)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+// UNSUPPORTED: asserts
+// REQUIRES: asserts
+// ^ this attempts to say "don't actually run this test", because it's broken
+//
+// The point of this test is to demonstrate something that ExprConstant accepts,
+// but Interp rejects. I had hoped to express that as the same file with two
----------------
sethp wrote:

😅 sorry, I got that from the abbreviation in the commit messages. 

What do you call it, when you need to distinguish it from the recursive-descent implementation?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87799