[clang] Fix/interp init list unnamed bitfields (PR #87799)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+// UNSUPPORTED: asserts
+// REQUIRES: asserts
+// ^ this attempts to say "don't actually run this test", because it's broken
----------------
sethp wrote:

Yeah, the test was meant to validate the "iterating the init expressions in the init list in-order will work for C records", but it doesn't get that far: in trying to do so, I uncovered a different bug.

What do you usually do, when that happens? Stop and dig out the bug? Or do you have some way you're deferring/keeping track of those kinds of things?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87799