[clang] [analyzer] Add std::any checker (PR #76580)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+//===- StdAnyChecker.cpp -------------------------------------*- C++ -*----===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugType.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/Checker.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ProgramState_Fwd.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
+
+#include "TaggedUnionModeling.h"
+
+using namespace clang;
+using namespace ento;
+using namespace tagged_union_modeling;
+
+REGISTER_MAP_WITH_PROGRAMSTATE(AnyHeldTypeMap, const MemRegion *, QualType)
+
+class StdAnyChecker : public Checker<eval::Call, check::RegionChanges> {
+  CallDescription AnyConstructor{{"std", "any", "any"}};
----------------
whisperity wrote:

What about `<T, Ts> std::make_any<T>(Ts&&...)`? I guess that one will call the constructor internally, so no problem here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76580