[PATCH] D159383: [Headers] Remove musl-related comment about NULL

[Derek Schuff via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

dschuff added a comment.

Although having said all that, I guess a question for @aaron.ballman or other clang header experts: It does seem that many std C headers in clang are designed to handle this kind of case using `include_next` (e.g. stdint.h and stdatomic.h) but not all of them (e.g. stddef.h or stdbool.h). So maybe we should try to make them consistent anyway.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D159383/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D159383