[PATCH] D41416: [modules] [pch] Do not deserialize all lazy template specializations when looking for one.
Shreyas via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 11 04:18:24 PDT 2023
SAtacker added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriterDecl.cpp:288
+ }
+ for (auto &SpecInfo : LazySpecializations) {
+ Record.push_back(SpecInfo.DeclID);
----------------
ChuanqiXu wrote:
> v.g.vassilev wrote:
> > We should not store the lazy specialization information as an array of items because that makes the search slow. Instead we should use the `OnDiskHashTable` approach which we use already to store the identifier data.
> Do you want to implement it in this patch? Or this is a note for future optimizations?
I tried it here https://reviews.llvm.org/D144831 but to my surprise it gives worse performance for my testing environment which generates random specializations per module and a single main file.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41416/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41416
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list