[PATCH] D134267: [C++] [Modules] Support one phase compilation model for named modules

[Chuanqi Xu via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

ChuanqiXu added a comment.

In D134267#3864368 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134267#3864368>, @ruoso wrote:

> FWIW, having a differently named argument for output files and input files is very important for tooling.
>
> In particular, in the case of remote execution, it makes a huge difference being able to tell what are the inputs and outputs by looking at the arguments alone, so I would like to make the case for an explicit output argument.
>
> In fact, this is something I'll request on GCC as well, since it currently uses the module mapper to figure out both the input and the output BMI files.

Is this a consensus of SG15?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D134267/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D134267