[PATCH] D134267: [C++] [Modules] Support one phase compilation model for named modules

[Daniel Ruoso via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

ruoso added a comment.

FWIW, having a differently named argument for output files and input files is very important for tooling.

In particular, in the case of remote execution, it makes a huge difference being able to tell what are the inputs and outputs by looking at the arguments alone, so I would like to make the case for an explicit output argument.

In fact, this is something I'll request on GCC as well, since it currently uses the module mapper to figure out both the input and the output BMI files.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D134267/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D134267