[PATCH] D128328: [C++20][Modules] Improve handing of Private Module Fragment diagnostics.
Iain Sandoe via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 23 00:31:34 PDT 2022
iains added a comment.
In D128328#3603942 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128328#3603942>, @ChuanqiXu wrote:
> In D128328#3603940 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128328#3603940>, @iains wrote:
>> In D128328#3602646 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128328#3602646>, @iains wrote:
>>> In D128328#3601080 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128328#3601080>, @ChuanqiXu wrote:
>>>> It looks like we need to handle inline variable as well to match the intention.
>>> can you construct a test-case, where this would apply and which is not already diagnosed as incorrect?
>> Did you have some ideas here?
> The test may be something like:
> export module A;
> inline int a;
> module :private
> int a = 0; // expected-error
but we reject this at the moment with "redefinition of 'a'" - so that implies we do not have fully correct C++17 handling here?
> But I feel like we couldn't go on before we get response from WG21.
Agreed, and anyway I think we would want to add a new test case, not to amend the example from the std (otherwise that becomes confusing as well)
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
More information about the cfe-commits