[PATCH] D119562: Provide fine control of color in run-clang-tidy

Eugene Zelenko via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 11 10:37:33 PST 2022


Eugene.Zelenko added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py:96
+    start.append('--use-color')
+  elif use_color is not None:
+    start.append('--use-color=false')
----------------
kesyog wrote:
> Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> > Shouldn't it be just `else:`?
> There are three cases:
> 
> | Argument  | `use_color` | Behavior |
> | `-use-color` | `True` | `--use-color` is passed to clang-tidy, force enabling color |
> | `-no-use-color` | `False` | `--use-color=false` is passed to clang-tidy, force disabling color |
> | (none provided) | `None` | Nothing passed to clang-tidy. clang-tidy follows its default coloring behavior |
> 
> The case on the highlighted line is the second row of the table, and we have to check that `use_color` is not `None` to exclude the case of the third row.
> 
> I was trying to avoid the extra nesting of something like below, but maybe the intent would be clearer?
> ```
> if use_color is not None:
>   if use_color:
>     start.append('--use-color')
>   else:
>     start.append('--use-color=false')
> ```
I think you implementation is incorrect. You should check for not `None` first and than set proper value for `--use-color`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D119562/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D119562



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list