[PATCH] D114025: [clang][NFC] Inclusive terms: replace some uses of sanity in clang

Zarko Todorovski via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 18 07:25:07 PST 2021


ZarkoCA added a comment.

In D114025#3140161 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114025#3140161>, @martong wrote:

> Do we have a comprehensive list of non-inclusive terms and their inclusive correspondent somewhere available?
> I mean `master` -> `main`, `white list` -> `inclusive list`, `sanity` -> `validation`, ...
> I'd assume that we go through that list, and that could give me a clue of how many such patches to expect in the future.
>
> Also, I was wondering that in list perhaps we could provide why we consider a term non-inclusive. Maybe it is just me but why is `sanity` considered non-inclusive?

I don't know of an official LLVM list, there could be one but I am not certain.

These two sources have been a good place to start for me: 
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-knodel-terminology-00.html
https://developers.google.com/style/inclusive-documentation

I have been working on finding replacements for `blacklist`, `whitelist`, and `sanity` in Clang/LLVM and @quinnp has been working on replacing `master` when possible. That's the extent of our list.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D114025/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D114025



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list