[PATCH] D114025: [clang][NFC] Inclusive terms: replace some uses of sanity in clang

[Gabor Marton via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

martong added a comment.

Do we have a comprehensive list of non-inclusive terms and their inclusive correspondent somewhere available?
I mean `master` -> `main`, `white list` -> `inclusive list`, `sanity` -> `validation`, ...
I'd assume that we go through that list, and that could give me a clue of how many such patches to expect in the future.

Also, I was wondering that in list perhaps we could provide why we consider a term non-inclusive. Maybe it is just me but why is `sanity` considered non-inclusive?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D114025/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D114025