[PATCH] D110891: [inliner] Mandatory inlining decisions produce remarks

[Wenlei He via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

wenlei accepted this revision.
wenlei added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

lgtm, thanks.



================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Analysis/InlineAdvisor.cpp:52
 
+namespace {
+using namespace llvm::ore;
----------------
mtrofin wrote:
> wenlei wrote:
> > curious why do we need anonymous namespace here?
> iiuc it's preferred we place file-local types inside an anonymous namespace. 
> 
> Looking now at the [[ https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#anonymous-namespaces | style guideline ]], it touts their benefits but also says I should have only placed de decl there and the impl of those members out... but the members are quite trivial. Happy to move them out though.
Thanks for the pointer. I don't have a strong opinion but slightly leaning towards moving out of anonymous namespace be consistent with how other InlineAdvice is organized (DefaultInlineAdvice, MLInlineAdvice not in anonymous namespace).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D110891/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D110891