[PATCH] D90174: [HIP] Fix regressions due to fp contract change

[Steve Canon via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

scanon added a comment.

Strictly speaking, fp-contract=fast probably should have been a separate flag entirely (since there's no _expression_ being contracted in fast). Unfortunately, that ship has sailed, and it does constrain our ability to choose an accurate name somewhat.

What if we just spell it out? fast-respect-pragma? fast-when-unspecified? I don't think that we really need to try to be as brief as possible with this one.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D90174/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D90174