[PATCH] D77615: [Syntax] Merge overlapping top-level macros in TokenBuffer
Sam McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 7 06:28:53 PDT 2020
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
sammccall marked an inline comment as done.
Closed by commit rGd66afd6dde54: [Syntax] Merge overlapping top-level macros in TokenBuffer (authored by sammccall).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77615?vs=255555&id=255663#toc
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77615/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77615
Files:
clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp
clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TokensTest.cpp
Index: clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TokensTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TokensTest.cpp
+++ clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TokensTest.cpp
@@ -497,11 +497,28 @@
mappings:
['#'_0, 'int'_7) => ['int'_0, 'int'_0)
['FOO'_10, '<eof>'_11) => ['10'_3, '<eof>'_7)
-)"}};
+)"},
+ {R"cpp(
+ #define NUM 42
+ #define ID(a) a
+ #define M 1 + ID
+ M(NUM)
+ )cpp",
+ R"(expanded tokens:
+ 1 + 42
+file './input.cpp'
+ spelled tokens:
+ # define NUM 42 # define ID ( a ) a # define M 1 + ID M ( NUM )
+ mappings:
+ ['#'_0, 'M'_17) => ['1'_0, '1'_0)
+ ['M'_17, '<eof>'_21) => ['1'_0, '<eof>'_3)
+)"},
+ };
- for (auto &Test : TestCases)
- EXPECT_EQ(Test.second, collectAndDump(Test.first))
- << collectAndDump(Test.first);
+ for (auto &Test : TestCases) {
+ std::string Dump = collectAndDump(Test.first);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Test.second, Dump) << Dump;
+ }
}
TEST_F(TokenCollectorTest, SpecialTokens) {
Index: clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp
@@ -436,14 +436,38 @@
SourceRange Range, const MacroArgs *Args) override {
if (!Collector)
return;
- // Only record top-level expansions, not those where:
+ const auto &SM = Collector->PP.getSourceManager();
+ // Only record top-level expansions that directly produce expanded tokens.
+ // This excludes those where:
// - the macro use is inside a macro body,
// - the macro appears in an argument to another macro.
- if (!MacroNameTok.getLocation().isFileID() ||
- (LastExpansionEnd.isValid() &&
- Collector->PP.getSourceManager().isBeforeInTranslationUnit(
- Range.getBegin(), LastExpansionEnd)))
+ // However macro expansion isn't really a tree, it's token rewrite rules,
+ // so there are other cases, e.g.
+ // #define B(X) X
+ // #define A 1 + B
+ // A(2)
+ // Both A and B produce expanded tokens, though the macro name 'B' comes
+ // from an expansion. The best we can do is merge the mappings for both.
+
+ // The *last* token of any top-level macro expansion must be in a file.
+ // (In the example above, see the closing paren of the expansion of B).
+ if (!Range.getEnd().isFileID())
return;
+ // If there's a current expansion that encloses this one, this one can't be
+ // top-level.
+ if (LastExpansionEnd.isValid() &&
+ !SM.isBeforeInTranslationUnit(LastExpansionEnd, Range.getEnd()))
+ return;
+
+ // If the macro invocation (B) starts in a macro (A) but ends in a file,
+ // we'll create a merged mapping for A + B by overwriting the endpoint for
+ // A's startpoint.
+ if (!Range.getBegin().isFileID()) {
+ Range.setBegin(SM.getExpansionLoc(Range.getBegin()));
+ assert(Collector->Expansions.count(Range.getBegin().getRawEncoding()) &&
+ "Overlapping macros should have same expansion location");
+ }
+
Collector->Expansions[Range.getBegin().getRawEncoding()] = Range.getEnd();
LastExpansionEnd = Range.getEnd();
}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D77615.255663.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3289 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20200407/8e3678a4/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list