[PATCH] D70390: [clang-tidy] new performance-no-automatic-move check.

[Clement Courbet via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

courbet added a comment.

> IMHO these two should just not overlap. It makes sense, to have controversial or configurable stuff in clang-tidy. It should just be consistent with the warnings, as those are "always right" and clang-tidy can be opinionated/specialized.

So to make sure I understand you're advocating for keeping the `const` version in the clang-tidy check but removing the `&&` detection from this check and let the warning deal with that ?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D70390/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D70390