[PATCH] D64375: [OpenMP][Docs] Provide implementation status details

[Alexey Bataev via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

ABataev added a comment.

In D64375#1574698 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64375#1574698>, @jdoerfert wrote:

> In D64375#1574662 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64375#1574662>, @ABataev wrote:
>
> > The scheme itself looks good in general.
>
>
> Good. Once we agreed on a scheme we can improve the actual process, excel sheet, generator script, etc. (see also below).
>
> > Just as an improvement, it would be good to use coloring for the feature status.
>
> I'll try to add coloring.
>
> > Also, what's the difference between claimed, mostly done and done?
>
> Disclaimer: I used a script to determine what the columns in the excel document mean. There is a good chance I got some wrong and it only reflects the information in the document.
>
> I basically used the following logic in this order:
>
> 1. If all non-empty columns contain the word "done", mark it as "done".
> 2. If all non-empty columns contain "mostly complete", mark it as "mostly done".
> 3. If there are non-empty columns, mark it as "claimed", e.g., someone is working on it.
> 4. If there are only empty columns, mark it as "unclaimed", e.g., not being worked on right now.
>
>   I think when we go through the excel document now with this use case in mind and fill the empty columns appropriately, some errors will dissapear.


Ok, I see. I will provide more correct feature status tomorrow, if you want. Currently it is not quite correct/full.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D64375/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D64375