[PATCH] D61424: [ASTImporter] Fix inequivalence of unresolved exception spec
Gabor Marton via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 2 02:53:27 PDT 2019
martong created this revision.
martong added reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik.
Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, gamesh411, Szelethus, dkrupp, rnkovacs.
Herald added a reviewer: a.sidorin.
Herald added a project: clang.
Structural equivalence of methods can falsely report false when the
exception specifier is unresolved (i.e unevaluated or not instantiated).
(This caused one assertion during bitcoin ctu-analysis.)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61424
Files:
clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp
clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp
Index: clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp
+++ clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp
@@ -322,6 +322,36 @@
return true;
}
+/// Check the eqeuivalence of exception specifications.
+static bool IsEquivalentExceptionSpec(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
+ const FunctionProtoType *Proto1,
+ const FunctionProtoType *Proto2) {
+
+ auto Spec1 = Proto1->getExceptionSpecType();
+ auto Spec2 = Proto2->getExceptionSpecType();
+
+ if (isUnresolvedExceptionSpec(Spec1) || isUnresolvedExceptionSpec(Spec2))
+ return true;
+
+ if (Spec1 != Spec2)
+ return false;
+ if (Spec1 == EST_Dynamic) {
+ if (Proto1->getNumExceptions() != Proto2->getNumExceptions())
+ return false;
+ for (unsigned I = 0, N = Proto1->getNumExceptions(); I != N; ++I) {
+ if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, Proto1->getExceptionType(I),
+ Proto2->getExceptionType(I)))
+ return false;
+ }
+ } else if (isComputedNoexcept(Spec1)) {
+ if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, Proto1->getNoexceptExpr(),
+ Proto2->getNoexceptExpr()))
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/// Determine structural equivalence of two types.
static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
QualType T1, QualType T2) {
@@ -536,24 +566,8 @@
cast<FunctionProtoType>(OrigT1.getDesugaredType(Context.FromCtx));
const auto *OrigProto2 =
cast<FunctionProtoType>(OrigT2.getDesugaredType(Context.ToCtx));
- auto Spec1 = OrigProto1->getExceptionSpecType();
- auto Spec2 = OrigProto2->getExceptionSpecType();
-
- if (Spec1 != Spec2)
+ if (!IsEquivalentExceptionSpec(Context, OrigProto1, OrigProto2))
return false;
- if (Spec1 == EST_Dynamic) {
- if (OrigProto1->getNumExceptions() != OrigProto2->getNumExceptions())
- return false;
- for (unsigned I = 0, N = OrigProto1->getNumExceptions(); I != N; ++I) {
- if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, OrigProto1->getExceptionType(I),
- OrigProto2->getExceptionType(I)))
- return false;
- }
- } else if (isComputedNoexcept(Spec1)) {
- if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, OrigProto1->getNoexceptExpr(),
- OrigProto2->getNoexceptExpr()))
- return false;
- }
// Fall through to check the bits common with FunctionNoProtoType.
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
Index: clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp
+++ clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp
@@ -3101,6 +3101,10 @@
auto *Recent = const_cast<FunctionDecl *>(
FoundByLookup->getMostRecentDecl());
ToFunction->setPreviousDecl(Recent);
+ // FIXME Should we merge exception specifications? E.g. In the "To"
+ // context the existing function may have exception specification with
+ // noexcept-unevaluated, while the newly imported function may have an
+ // evaluated noexcept.
}
// Import Ctor initializers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D61424.197726.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3331 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20190502/2039e5bf/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list