[PATCH] D59555: [analyzer] Add yaml parser to GenericTaintChecker
Borsik Gábor via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 25 14:35:06 PDT 2019
boga95 marked an inline comment as done.
boga95 added a comment.
Why is it better not to use `static` functions/variables? Has it any performance impact?
================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/GenericTaintChecker.cpp:73-75
static const unsigned InvalidArgIndex = UINT_MAX;
/// Denotes the return vale.
static const unsigned ReturnValueIndex = UINT_MAX - 1;
----------------
Szelethus wrote:
> We should definitely change these, not only is the large integer number impossible to remember, but this value could differ on different platforms.
I tried to use int, but I got a lot of warnings because of the `getNumArgs()` returns an unsigned value.
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59555/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59555
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list