[PATCH] D28462: clang-format: Add new style option AlignConsecutiveMacros
MyDeveloperDay via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 29 07:28:07 PST 2019
MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
I checked this out and built this and it works really well. The thing I really like is that it helps to format Windows resource include files e.g. 'Resource.h' better than before.
Which changes the current clang-formatted version
#define IDD_AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 101
#define IDS_BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 101
#define IDR_CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 102
#define IDB_DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 103
#define IDS_EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 104
#define IDR_FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 106
#define IDD_GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG 107
#define IDD_HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 108
#define IDS_IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111
#define IDS_JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ 112
#define IDS_KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK 114
#define IDD_LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 115
to
#define IDD_AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 101
#define IDS_BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 101
#define IDR_CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 102
#define IDB_DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 103
#define IDS_EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 104
#define IDR_FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 106
#define IDD_GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG 107
#define IDD_HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 108
#define IDS_IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111
#define IDS_JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ 112
#define IDS_KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK 114
#define IDD_LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 115
But alas it will still fight with Visual Studio which wants to align them with its 40 characters or 1+ more than the #define length strategy (e.g.)
#define IDD_AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 101
#define IDS_BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 101
#define IDR_CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 102
#define IDB_DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 103
#define IDS_EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 104
#define IDR_FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 106
#define IDD_GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG 107
#define IDD_HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 108
#define IDS_IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111
#define IDS_JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ 112
#define IDS_KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK 114
#define IDD_LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 115
I don't want to suggest anything that would block this patch going in, ( because I know people have been waiting for it for a long time) , but ultimately I wonder if people may suggest having different macro alignment strategies and options later on.
Maybe if AlignConsecutiveMacros was an enumeration rather than just a Boolean (even if its only had None,Aligned for now) it might allow someone to more easily add a new strategy later on without breaking compatibility.
Apart form that I think its great, and thank you for taking the mantle.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28462/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28462
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list