[clang-tools-extra] r286222 - [clang-tidy] clang-analyzer-alpha* checks are not registered, so there's no need to disable them
Alexander Kornienko via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Nov 8 08:59:18 PST 2016
I'd instead ask Static Analyzer folks if they can graduate this check. What
is your experience with it? Do you feel it's good enough for mainstream?
On Nov 8, 2016 2:11 AM, "Malcolm Parsons" <malcolm.parsons at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 November 2016 at 08:28, Alexander Kornienko via cfe-commits
> <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > [clang-tidy] clang-analyzer-alpha* checks are not registered, so there's
> no need to disable them
>
> Oh, I was using clang-analyzer-alpha.cplusplus.VirtualCall.
>
> Should clang-tidy have an option to enable experimental checks?
>
> --
> Malcolm Parsons
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20161108/e909208e/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list