[clang-tools-extra] r286222 - [clang-tidy] clang-analyzer-alpha* checks are not registered, so there's no need to disable them

Malcolm Parsons via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Nov 8 09:44:33 PST 2016


On 8 November 2016 at 16:59, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2016 2:11 AM, "Malcolm Parsons" <malcolm.parsons at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Oh, I was using clang-analyzer-alpha.cplusplus.VirtualCall.
>>
>> Should clang-tidy have an option to enable experimental checks?
>
> I'd instead ask Static Analyzer folks if they can graduate this check. What
> is your experience with it? Do you feel it's good enough for mainstream?

It found lots of places where delegating constructors, final classes
or final virtual methods would be useful.
I agreed with its analysis.

-- 
Malcolm Parsons


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list