[PATCH] Fixes for OpenBSD amd64/powerpc/mips64 support

[Bill Wendling]

What's the cost :: benefit ratio for this? Is not including this patch
going to block something critical? We're in phase II testing, so we need to
be extra picky about patches here.

-bw


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote:

> On 05/12/13 1:34 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>> Get what committed? I don't see a patch here.
>>
>> -bw
>>
>
> It was at the beginning of the thread..
>
> http://marc.info/?l=cfe-commits&m=138588474806028&w=2
>
>
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Rafael Espíndola
>> <rafael.espindola at gmail.com <mailto:rafael.espindola at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>      > So can we get this commited?
>>
>>     Depends on Bill's opinion about porting this to 3.4. If it is not OK
>>     to 3.4 I think we should try o use gnutools::Assemble::ConstructJob
>> on
>>     trunk instead.
>>
>>     Cheers,
>>     Rafael
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131206/52015b96/attachment.html>