[PATCH] Fixes for OpenBSD amd64/powerpc/mips64 support

[Brad Smith]

On 06/12/13 2:30 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> What's the cost :: benefit ratio for this? Is not including this patch
> going to block something critical? We're in phase II testing, so we need
> to be extra picky about patches here.

I understand we're in phase II... the patches are OpenBSD specific and
you just commited the same type of patches here for NetBSD..

http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/2013-December/007332.html
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/2013-December/007333.html

> -bw
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com
> <mailto:brad at comstyle.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 05/12/13 1:34 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>         Get what committed? I don't see a patch here.
>
>         -bw
>
>
>     It was at the beginning of the thread..
>
>     http://marc.info/?l=cfe-__commits&m=138588474806028&w=2
>     <http://marc.info/?l=cfe-commits&m=138588474806028&w=2>
>
>
>         On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Rafael Espíndola
>         <rafael.espindola at gmail.com <mailto:rafael.espindola at gmail.com>
>         <mailto:rafael.espindola at __gmail.com
>         <mailto:rafael.espindola at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
>               > So can we get this commited?
>
>              Depends on Bill's opinion about porting this to 3.4. If it
>         is not OK
>              to 3.4 I think we should try o use
>         gnutools::Assemble::__ConstructJob on
>              trunk instead.
>
>              Cheers,
>              Rafael
>
>
>
>         --
>         This message has been scanned for viruses and
>         dangerous content by *MailScanner*
>         <http://www.mailscanner.info/>__, and is
>         believed to be clean.
>
>
>
>     --
>     This message has been scanned for viruses and
>     dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>     believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.