[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Rename

[Zhongxing Xu]

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com> wrote:

>
> On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:31 PM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:
>>
>>  Yeah, it seems a little confusing. But other names are worse:
>>> AbstractVal, too long
>>> AVal, like nonsense.
>>> ProgVal, even farther way.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah I agree.  I also thought of "SymVal" for symbolic value, but that
>> conflates with our use of symbols.  I also thought of SemVal, for "semantic"
>> value.  This one is kind of nice because it reflects that we are reasoning
>> about "semantics" as opposed to "syntax".
>>
>
> What about "SVal"? "S" can represent many meanings: semantic value,
> symbolic value, static-analysis value. And it's shorter.
>
>
> Sounds good!  For a second I thought it conflicted with something from
> Lisp, but I was thinking of "s expressions."  It's also the same number of
> characters as RVal.
>

Then I'll do a new patch and commit?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20081017/b17c1622/attachment.html>