[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Rename

[Ted Kremenek]

On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:48 PM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com>  
> wrote:
>
> On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:31 PM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, it seems a little confusing. But other names are worse:
>> AbstractVal, too long
>> AVal, like nonsense.
>> ProgVal, even farther way.
>>
>> Yeah I agree.  I also thought of "SymVal" for symbolic value, but  
>> that conflates with our use of symbols.  I also thought of SemVal,  
>> for "semantic" value.  This one is kind of nice because it reflects  
>> that we are reasoning about "semantics" as opposed to "syntax".
>>
>> What about "SVal"? "S" can represent many meanings: semantic value,  
>> symbolic value, static-analysis value. And it's shorter.
>
> Sounds good!  For a second I thought it conflicted with something  
> from Lisp, but I was thinking of "s expressions."  It's also the  
> same number of characters as RVal.
>
> Then I'll do a new patch and commit?

Yes please.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20081016/f2265d5e/attachment.html>