[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Rename

[Ted Kremenek]

On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com>  
> wrote:
>
> On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:31 PM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:
>
> Yeah, it seems a little confusing. But other names are worse:
> AbstractVal, too long
> AVal, like nonsense.
> ProgVal, even farther way.
>
> Yeah I agree.  I also thought of "SymVal" for symbolic value, but  
> that conflates with our use of symbols.  I also thought of SemVal,  
> for "semantic" value.  This one is kind of nice because it reflects  
> that we are reasoning about "semantics" as opposed to "syntax".
>
> What about "SVal"? "S" can represent many meanings: semantic value,  
> symbolic value, static-analysis value. And it's shorter.

Sounds good!  For a second I thought it conflicted with something from  
Lisp, but I was thinking of "s expressions."  It's also the same  
number of characters as RVal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20081016/fb1d6e6f/attachment.html>