<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Ted Kremenek <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kremenek@apple.com">kremenek@apple.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d"><br> On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:31 PM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:<br> <br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Yeah, it seems a little confusing. But other names are worse:<br> AbstractVal, too long<br> AVal, like nonsense.<br> ProgVal, even farther way.<br> </blockquote> <br></div> Yeah I agree. I also thought of "SymVal" for symbolic value, but that conflates with our use of symbols. I also thought of SemVal, for "semantic" value. This one is kind of nice because it reflects that we are reasoning about "semantics" as opposed to "syntax".<br> </blockquote></div><br>What about "SVal"? "S" can represent many meanings: semantic value, symbolic value, static-analysis value. And it's shorter.<br></div></blockquote></div><br><div>Sounds good! For a second I thought it conflicted with something from Lisp, but I was thinking of "s expressions." It's also the same number of characters as RVal.</div></body></html>