[llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
Dan Gohman via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 19 15:59:41 PDT 2018
Hi Eric,
We've been waiting until we stabilize various key interfaces, including the
builtin functions, the C ABI, and the .o file format., as we'd like to
avoid having users using packaged versions of LLVM producing C/C++ source
files or .o/.a files that end up being incompatible with newer versions of
LLVM.
To my knowledge, all of the major issues are fixed now, and the only
remaining blocker is that we need to decide what to do here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43675 (Rename imported/exported memory symbol to
__linear_memory)
Dan
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> WebAssembly has been around for a while now, it's still being actively
> worked on and used. I think it's long past time we make it a normal target
> so that it gets tested on a regular basis. (Most recent random breakage is
> https://reviews.llvm.org/rL342576 which fails make check with web
> assembly enabled).
>
> Any objections? I'll probably do this next week unless someone raises a
> strong objection here.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -eric
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180919/223badbd/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list