[llvm-dev] [PATCH] Add support for the 'unless' matcher in the dynamic layer.
Samuel Benzaquen via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 26 15:29:38 PDT 2016
One of the reasons we added the minimum was because these nodes added
overhead to the matching that was not unnecessary when they only had a
On the current implementation we could actually get rid of the node
completely for the one argument calls.
I would be ok with removing the lower bound.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Zac Hansen <xaxxon at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any objection to removing the 2-element
> minimum on the eachOf, anyOf and allOf matchers.
> It is frustrating when playing with matchers to have to edit significant
> amounts of code to be able to temporarily go from 2 to 1 matcher inside an
> any- or allOf matcher.
> And overall it feels very "un-set-theory"-like.
> The change was made here:
> Thank you and apologies if I sent this to the wrong lists/people.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev