[llvm-dev] [PATCH] Add support for the 'unless' matcher in the dynamic layer.

Zac Hansen via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 26 15:20:20 PDT 2016

I was wondering if there is any objection to removing the 2-element minimum
on the eachOf, anyOf and allOf matchers.

It is frustrating when playing with matchers to have to edit significant
amounts of code to be able to temporarily go from 2 to 1 matcher inside an
any- or allOf matcher.

And overall it feels very "un-set-theory"-like.

The change was made here:

Thank you and apologies if I sent this to the wrong lists/people.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160726/4383e3b1/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list